Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benefits of nuclear far outweigh the risks of using it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The using of nuclear power is becoming debatable.

While

some think it is dangerous , others find it advantageous.

This

essay will discuss why I agree the upsides of nuclear far outweigh the risks of using it.

First,

the cost of using nuclear power is lower than non-renewable efficiency. The main expense of using nuclear

energy

is only

bulding

Correct your spelling

building

the stations . They

last

a long time and run at a lower cost as the fuel cost is low compared to

other non-renewable

Change the wording

another non-renewable energy source

other non-renewable energy sources

show examples

energy

source like wind and solar.

Moreover

, they only need a few

fuel

Change to a plural noun

fuels

show examples

and produce a substantial amount of

energy

.

Therefore

, there is no doubt that they are more cost-effective in the long run. Apart from that, the role of nuclear

energy

in meeting global

energy

demands because it’s reliable whatever the weather. Uranium is a raw material that's widely available, which makes nuclear power a long-term, low-carbon solution.

For example

,in the UK, the existing network of nuclear reactors produces 20% of their total electricity and has been running safely for more than 60 years. In conclusion, the pros of using nuclear toughness outweigh the cons of using it obviously