Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
In the academic world, there is a debate about how
universities
should be structured. Some believe that students
should have freedom
to choose their subject, following their passion. Others argue for a focus on education Add an article
the freedom
that is
seen vital
for the future. I believe that Change preposition
as vital
universities
should implement both strategies, give students
freedom of choice and also
teach them important skills.
On one side of the debate are proponents of academic flexibility, arguing that university students
should have the freedom to study topics that genuinely interest them. This
approach cultivates a love for learning and encourages scholars to engage deeply with their chosen fields of study. For instance
, a student passionate about history may excel in that subject, developing critical thinking and analytical skills that can be valuable in various professions. Furthermore
, allowing learners to pursue their interests can lead to a more diverse and intellectual academic environment, where individuals bring unique perspectives to discussions and problem-solving.
On the other hand
, there is an argument for highlighting disciplines with practical applications, particularly in STEM fields. In today's increasingly technology-driven world, skills in areas like computer science, engineering, and data analysis are in high demand. By prioritizing these fields, universities
can better equip pupils with the tools they need to thrive in the job market and contribute to innovation and economic growth. Additionally
, a focus on STEM education can help alleviate skill shortages in critical industries such
as healthcare, environmental sustainability, and information technology, ensuring our society continues to progress and thrive.
In conclusion, while
there are valid points on both sides of the debate, I believe a balanced approach is necessary. Universities
should strive to offer a diverse range of subjects that cater to learners' interests while
also
ensuring they acquire the competencies needed for future success. By providing opportunities for exploration and practical learning, universities
can empower students
to pursue their passions while
preparing them for the challenges and opportunities of the modern worldSubmitted by nursuluu.dec on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Introduction
Expand your introduction to give a clearer overview of the essay's direction and the viewpoints to be discussed. This provides the reader with a roadmap of your argument and establishes the scope of the essay.
Supporting Evidence
Add more specific examples and evidence to strengthen your arguments. For instance, mention particular case studies or statistics related to the benefits of studying STEM subjects or the advantages of following one's passion in academia. This makes your points more convincing and tangible.
Logical Structure
Improve the logical structure by ensuring that each paragraph has a clear main idea and that all sentences within the paragraph support this idea. Use transition words to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs smoothly.
Conclusion
In the conclusion, briefly summarize the main points of your argument before stating your opinion. This reinforces your position and provides a satisfying closure to the essay.