Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Contemporary society is known as the era of well-being. From

this

aspect, questions about whether shops should not be allowed to sell any

food

or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be detrimental to an individual’s

health

are raised. In my opinion, selling any eating products should be regulated to some extent. Irrefutably, controlled

food

sales can improve personal

health

.

This

is because individuals

become

Verb problem

find it

show examples

hard to access unhealthy groceries and beverages.

This

obviously leads to the natural purchase of healthy products and

this

in turn allows consumers to experience weight loss, high concentration, and better

health

conditions. What is more,

although

heavy

food

regulation encourages illegal retail, appropriate

food

regulation can prevent over-expenses. To exemplify, big fans of instant

food

no longer purchase plenty of snacks and sodas and hardly store significant quantities of harmful

food

in their pantry.

This

,

therefore

, leads to saving living costs.

Nevertheless

, the rights of consumers are crucial. In order words, since a purchase decision about harmful

food

is made by customers, they need to check information

of

Change preposition

on

show examples

food

components, so they have responsibility for the consequences.

To conclude

, the rights of consumers are crucial but controlled

food

sales can improve personal

health

and appropriate

food

regulation can prevent over-expenses.

Thus

, selling any groceries and beverages should be regulated.