There are opposite views either
children
’s
leisure
agendas should be decided by
parents
or themselves. In my opinion, I believe that it is best to give
children
freedomAdd an article
show examples
to choose
free-time
activities
because it can improve their self-confidence.
On the one hand, the management of
free-time
activities
among
children
must be handled by
parents
in order to not waste their potential. Generally, when a child tries to select particular
activities
to fill their
leisure
time, the decision
underpinsAdd a missing verb
show examples
either
from Change preposition
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
conformity towards their friends or they just want to have fun.
As a result
,
children
will not acknowledge their
areaFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of
interestsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
as well as
fully develop their potential. If
parents
are taking
roleAdd an article
show examples
to
arrangedWrong verb form
show examples
their
free-time
activities
;
however
, those risks can be alleviated. It can be seen among South Korean
parents
, who mostly contribute to
arrangeWrong verb form
show examples
their
children
’s
leisure
activities
since they do not want to waste prominent resources that can enhance their child’s competencies, and later
enablesCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
them to possess useful skills when entering higher educational stages. Regarding
this
notion,
nevertheless
, I do not think
this
method can benefit
children
in the long run because it
causeChange the verb form
show examples
lackCorrect article usage
show examples
of
independencyReplace the word
show examples
toward themselves.
On the other hand
, giving offspring the liberty to decide
pursuitsChange preposition
show examples
during their spare time can improve self-confidence. Entrusting
children
with their own choices subliminally prompts them to believe
Change preposition
show examples
theirChange preposition
show examples
abilities. A 2018 research by the Anna Freud Centre revealed that the consequences of autonomous
parents
who gave their
children
opportunities to choose their additional
activities
during school breaks
,Remove the comma
show examples
caused greater improvements in their self-confidence that consecutively preserved until their secondary school period. Meanwhile, those
whomCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
parents
tried to take control over all educational and non-educational schedules, made
children
feltWrong verb form
show examples
inferior
,Remove the comma
show examples
and deemed to doubt their competencies. Reflecting
thisChange preposition
show examples
view;
therefore
, I support the idea that enables
children
to have their own dependency for choosing
free-time
activities
since it can embark
positiveChange preposition
show examples
characteristics that
maintainsChange the verb form
show examples
for the long term.
In conclusion,
although
parents
-centred management of
leisure
activities
benefits
children
toChange preposition
show examples
not
wasteWrong verb form
show examples
their potential, I think
this
method slowly deters them from being fully independent
towardChange preposition
show examples
themselvesCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
.
Therefore
, I support the belief of giving more liberty
towardChange preposition
show examples
children
in order to prompt their positive attributes, which can be useful in the long term.