Recently,
retirement
age has sparked a heated debate. Some people think it is fair to retire at 65 for everyone, Use synonyms
while
others argue that some special occupations deserve an earlier Linking Words
retirement
. Personally, I agree with the latter view. Use synonyms
This
essay with give reasons on my point of view with examples.
Undoubtedly, social welfare should be equail to all citizens, Linking Words
however
, every job is a different profession which has specific demands in different areas. Linking Words
Therefore
, some workers ought to retire when their conditions are no longer best fit the role after consistant devotion to their duties. Linking Words
For example
, occupations that involve heavy physical labor, Linking Words
such
as construction workers, miners, and factory workers, should be considered for early Linking Words
retirement
Use synonyms
due to
the toll on their bodies over time.
Linking Words
Moreover
, jobs which are exposed to risks and dangers, Linking Words
such
as firefighters, police officers, and military personnel, should have the option to retire early because these are professions under high risks which may lead to severe physical and mental stress. Many jobs are associated with intensive energy consumption, life dangers and hazardous working environment, it is justified for people conducting these jobs to retire and receive their pension at an ealier age. Linking Words
This
policy can Linking Words
also
encourage young people to engage in these occupations Linking Words
thus
benefiting the scociety as a whole.
Linking Words
To conclude
, different occupation should have a different Linking Words
retirement
age, especially the ones with heavy duties and under risks. Use synonyms
This
will not break the equality of scocial benefits, inversely, there may be advantageous effects for harmonious scocietal development.Linking Words
carriexue23