The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000. Summarize the formation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the production of three types of energy in
units
, coal, petroleum
, and natural gas between 1981 to 2000.
Overall
, it can be seen from the diagram the consumption of petroleum
was higher than the other two, while
coal was the least consumed by the citizens and dramatic fluctuations can be experienced in natural gas, while
petroleum
and coal declined after oscillations.
It is conspicuous that, in 1981 petroleum
consumed 90 million
units
and it immediately jumped to 140 million
units
in 1984, further
it was constant till 1987 and from that year it plunged to 100 billion units
in 1990. Furthermore
, it swung and augmented touched 140 million
units
in 1996, in addition
after some movements it hit 140 million
units
in 2000.
Probing ahead, coal energy was 80 million
units
in 1981, which was almost constant till 1982 and after that, it plummeted and attained 38 million
units
in 1984 after the consumption of coal was
increased dramatically and touched 60 Unnecessary verb
apply
million
units
in 1986, additionally
, it was partially constant till 1989 and kept declining until reached to 35 million
units
in 2000. In addition
, natural gas was nearly 40 million
units
in 1981 after it was unchanged till nine years in 1990, then
it showed an increment gradually and hit 100 million
units
in 2000.Submitted by rbtech65 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "in addition, while".
▼
Vocabulary: Replace the words units, petroleum, million with synonyms.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "dramatic" was used 2 times.
▼