The government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree of disagree?

People have different views as to whether the government should spend more revenue on educating

science

than other courses for a developing c. In my opinion, despite there are various benefits of

this

, I firmly believe that it brings about many more drawbacks. On the one hand, there are two main reasons why more income should be vested in the field of

science

.

Firstly

, it could resolve a shortage of scientists, especially in the pharmaceutical department. In doing so, there will be more studies and

researches

Fix the agreement mistake

research

show examples

on germs and diseases, resulting in new vaccines and medical treatments, which will save countless people.

Moreover

, it leads to scientific and technological breakthroughs.

For instance

, products

such

as autonomous driving, washing machines, or advanced knowledge like genetic engineering. All of

this

means that our lives will be better than before.

On the other hand

, there are two key points why we should disagree with

this

statement.

Firstly

, the sector of art, music, and culture might stop developing.

For example

, if the financial support to improve facilities or instruments is limited by the government,

then

it is likely that some traditional songs or events will disappear or extinct.

Secondly

, children should be treated equally to the same standard. To be precise, students tend to perform better in what they love, limiting financial aid

although

paying the same amount of tuition fees would hinder their potential ability. In conclusion, even though putting numerous resources

on

Change preposition

into

show examples

science

provides many advantages to us, I genuinely believe that the government should spend money equally and not solely on teaching

science

.