Some think that Interviews are not reliable way for hiring employees. It is important to apply other methods for this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that employers cannot hire employees through
interviews
, and using other methods for this
is urging. Although
interviews
can be useful in some cases, I completely agree with the statements because there are better and alternative ways, and interviews
cannot assess individuals’ full potential or can be subjective.
When it comes to hiring employees, I think there are a lot of ways that are more reliable than interviews
. One of these ways is by checking people’s backgrounds. This
suggests that checking past employment can provide valuable insights into a candidate’s work history and performance, which is difficult to get through interviews
. Additionally
, by checking the background of employees, managers can be aware of employers’ skills, priorities, lacks, and behaviours, which can make it easier for employers to deal with new workers. This
method can be very crucial and reliable in many fields, like banking and financial sectors, healthcare areas, and others. As a result
, by doing so, managers can figure out more crucial things about new stuff and understand them deeper, instead
of just face-to-face interviews
and questions.
Furthermore
, the reason why I assert that it is absolutely essential to use alternative techniques for this
is because of the drawbacks of interviews
. The first drawback is subjectivity. In other words
, the people having an interview with candidates have a chance to choose the worthy one, as they can help the people they know in interviews
by hiring them. Moreover
, interviews
can be influenced by interviewer biases, which may affect their judgment and lead to unfair evaluations. As a consequence
, companies may lose the best-suited workers because interviewers do not choose them. Another drawback is feeling anxiety or stress while
performing. This
implies that some candidates may perform poorly in an interview setting due to
stress or nervousness, which does not necessarily reflect their actual job performance capabilities., and because of this
, they can be rejected.
All things considered, while
interviews
may be helpful in certain situations, I entirely agree with the statement that there are better and more unbiased methods to determine a person's ability.Submitted by minimix1203 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While you effectively addressed the task, providing both an introduction and a conclusion that summarize your points well, try to provide a few more specific examples to make your arguments even clearer and more convincing.
coherence cohesion
Ensure smoother transitions: While your essay generally flows well, there are a few places where the transition between ideas could be smoother. Consider using more linking words or phrases to guide the reader through your argument.
coherence cohesion
You have an excellent introduction and a strong conclusion, which effectively summarize your points and give your essay a strong structure.
task achievement
Your main points are relevant and clearly supported by explanations, making your argument convincingly.