The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In today’s fast-paced world, scientific advancement has become a key factor to ensure a secure and fulfilling life,
this
is why some people argue that the people’s lives improvement should be the most important goal of science. Personally, I agree and believe that if other aims such
as discovering the unknown windows of the universe or producing war-related equipment are valued over the former aim, mankind will witness the detrimental consequences of these approaches.
In case scientist do research solely due to
their sense of curiosity and fulfilling this
need, it would be time-consuming and energy-consuming. In other words
, scientists sometimes investigate the possible aspects of a particular subject just because they aspire to uncover the covered facts and hope that these results will be practical in the future. However
, most of the time, these findings are not efficacious and in correlation with the current needs and mankind’s issues, leading to consuming time, natural resources and financial support, which could be utilized in reaching other goals. For instance
, investigations on finding a new method to cure cancer would be more effective in comparison to a study focused on the reason why cats purr.
Furthermore
, war equipment is the manifestation of scientific work, which has revolutionized the whole world in this
deleterious and irredeemable way. These days numerous individuals, predominantly vulnerable groups of people including elderly ones, children etc. are being killed due to
the emergence of war and using these weaponry machines, which all have been invented because of scientific enhancements. This
is the reason why the science world should be oriented to make people’s lives better and prevent such
harmful and devastating accidents from influencing the population.
In conclusion, I believe the most important part on which science should set its goals is undoubtedly human improvement, preventing the use of resources to reach useless and purposeless outcomes and to eliminate
detrimental impacts of war.Change the verb form
eliminating
Submitted by ava.saljoughi on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant specific examples
Consider expanding on the examples provided. The example about the focus on cancer over cats purring is relevant, but you could deepen the argument by discussing specific sectors in healthcare that benefit from scientific advancements.
logical structure
Ensure that your main points are consistently linked back to the central argument about science's purpose. Use clear topic sentences to maintain this connection throughout the essay.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion are well-defined, giving a clear frame to your argument.
complete response
The essay addresses multiple dimensions of the topic, touching on curiosity-driven research and militarization, thus presenting a balanced argument.