Some people think that all unviersity students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
The ongoing debate about whether university
students
should have the autonomy to choose their subjects
or be restricted to disciplines considered essential, such
as science
and technology
, continues to spark considerable discussion. While
some advocate for academic freedom, others contend that prioritizing subjects
with direct practical applications is more advantageous. In this
essay, I will examine both perspectives and present my own viewpoint.
On the one hand, granting students
the liberty to select their fields of study fosters creativity, passion, and intrinsic motivation. When students
are given the opportunity to explore their interests, they are more likely to be engaged and perform at their best. For instance
, individuals with a deep-seated passion for the arts may thrive in domains such
as literature or music, making valuable contributions to the cultural and creative sectors. Conversely
, compelling students
to focus solely on subjects
they find uninspiring could lead to disengagement, underachievement, and a
potential suppression of innovation in non-technical areas Remove the article
apply
such
as the humanities or social sciences.
On the other hand
, it is argued that an emphasis on disciplines like science
, technology
, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is crucial for future societal progress. As the world becomes increasingly dependent on technological advancements, expertise in these fields is highly sought after in the global job market. Countries that prioritize STEM education frequently enjoy economic growth driven by breakthroughs in scientific research and technological innovation. Furthermore
, careers in fields like healthcare, engineering, and information technology
are not only in high demand but also
offer job security and substantial economic benefits, thus
making a case for steering students
towards these areas.
In my view, while
it is undeniably important to encourage students
to pursue subjects
that are likely to be useful in the evolving job market, it is equally vital to preserve their freedom to follow their personal interests. A more balanced approach could involve providing a core curriculum that encompasses key subjects
such
as science
and technology
, while
also
allowing students
the flexibility to select electives from other disciplines. This
would ensure that graduates possess the fundamental skills necessary for future employment, while
also
nurturing their creativity and personal growth.
In conclusion, both positions hold merit. While
prioritizing subjects
like science
and technology
is essential for future economic and technological development, it is equally important to allow students
the freedom to explore their passions. A hybrid approach, combining the practical benefits of a core curriculum with the flexibility of elective choices, would create a more holistic educational system that better equips students
to face the multifaceted challenges of the modern world.Submitted by dnm.best on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant specific examples
While examples provided are relevant, incorporating more specific or varied examples can enhance support for the arguments presented.
complete response
Ensure that all points are developed equally to maintain a comprehensive response throughout the essay. While both sides of the argument are addressed, more depth in certain areas could strengthen the task response.
logical structure
The essay presents a clear and logical structure with a strong introduction and a well-rounded conclusion.
clear comprehensive ideas
The arguments are presented clearly, with good use of comparative language to weigh both sides of the issue.
complete response
The use of a hybrid approach suggestion in the conclusion is effective and adds depth to the task response.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?