The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at the table provided compares the

number

Use synonyms

of temporary labour forces who migrated to Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States during the period from 2003 to 2006

as well as

Linking Words

their proportion per 1000 individuals in 2006. It is evident from the information supplied that the United States was by far the leader in attracting the most temporary foreign

workers

Use synonyms

from 577000 in 2003 peaked at 678000 in 2006. Meanwhile, a moderate

number

Use synonyms

of migrated

workers

Use synonyms

had a temporary occupation in Australia and the United Kingdom at 152000 and 137000 in 2003 respectively. Having passed three years, it reached 219000 in the former and doubled in the latter. In stark contrast,

however

Linking Words

, New Zealand accepted fewer

workers

Use synonyms

from other nations at 65000 in 2003 and a slightly higher 87000 in 2006. With regard to the

number

Use synonyms

of temporary migrant

workers

Use synonyms

per 1000 people in 2006, there was a negative correlation among the supplied data. Attracting the least foreign

workers

Use synonyms

, from 1000 inhabitants in New Zealand 21.1 were foreign

workers

Use synonyms

,

while

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

was just 2.3 in the United States despite accepting the highest

number

Use synonyms

of foreign

workers

Use synonyms

.

Likewise

Linking Words

, these figures were 10.7 in Australia and 4.4 in the United Kingdom. In general, it can be inferred from the ratio of foreign

workers

Use synonyms

to every 1000 people that countries with a great deal of foreign

workers

Use synonyms

also

Linking Words

contained more inhabitants and vice versa.