The table illustrates the data about different types of families living in 
poverty
 in Australia in 1999.
Use synonyms
Overall
, there are six Linking Words
six 
classifications, including single aged person, Remove the redundancy
apply
aged
 Add an article
an aged
couple
, Use synonyms
singe
 without Correct your spelling
single
children
, Use synonyms
couple
 without Use synonyms
children
, sole parent and Use synonyms
couple
 with Use synonyms
children
. Categorically, Use synonyms
poverty
 rates are higher for single persons compared to households with Use synonyms
husband
 or wife.
In terms of Correct article usage
a husband
Correct article usage
the totally
totally
 situation of Change the adverb
total
whole
 Correct article usage
the whole
Australia
, there were 11% of households in Change preposition
of Australia
poverty
 in 1999, with the accurate figure Use synonyms
was
 1837000. Those consisting of single aged Replace the word
being
person
 figured at 6%(54000), which was Fix the agreement mistake
persons
relatively
 low Correct article usage
a relatively
poverty
 rate Use synonyms
comparing
 with Wrong verb form
compared
other
. Fix the agreement mistake
others
On the other hand
, sole Linking Words
parent
 and single without Fix the agreement mistake
parents
children
 were the most prone to be poor, at 21%(232000) and 19%(359000) separately.
For families with partners, Use synonyms
Use synonyms
couple
 with Fix the agreement mistake
couples
children
 were the most common in Use synonyms
poverty
, at 12%(933000), Use synonyms
while
 still approximately half of the highest. Linking Words
Couple
 with Use synonyms
children
’s figure was lower, at 7%(211000). The proportion of aged Use synonyms
Use synonyms
couple
 was the lowest in families with partners but Fix the agreement mistake
couples
also
 entire households, at only 4%(48000)Linking Words