The table illustrates the data about different types of families living in
poverty
in Australia in 1999.
Use synonyms
Overall
, there are six Linking Words
six
classifications, including single aged person, Remove the redundancy
apply
aged
Add an article
an aged
couple
, Use synonyms
singe
without Correct your spelling
single
children
, Use synonyms
couple
without Use synonyms
children
, sole parent and Use synonyms
couple
with Use synonyms
children
. Categorically, Use synonyms
poverty
rates are higher for single persons compared to households with Use synonyms
husband
or wife.
In terms of Correct article usage
a husband
Correct article usage
the totally
totally
situation of Change the adverb
total
whole
Correct article usage
the whole
Australia
, there were 11% of households in Change preposition
of Australia
poverty
in 1999, with the accurate figure Use synonyms
was
1837000. Those consisting of single aged Replace the word
being
person
figured at 6%(54000), which was Fix the agreement mistake
persons
relatively
low Correct article usage
a relatively
poverty
rate Use synonyms
comparing
with Wrong verb form
compared
other
. Fix the agreement mistake
others
On the other hand
, sole Linking Words
parent
and single without Fix the agreement mistake
parents
children
were the most prone to be poor, at 21%(232000) and 19%(359000) separately.
For families with partners, Use synonyms
Use synonyms
couple
with Fix the agreement mistake
couples
children
were the most common in Use synonyms
poverty
, at 12%(933000), Use synonyms
while
still approximately half of the highest. Linking Words
Couple
with Use synonyms
children
’s figure was lower, at 7%(211000). The proportion of aged Use synonyms
Use synonyms
couple
was the lowest in families with partners but Fix the agreement mistake
couples
also
entire households, at only 4%(48000)Linking Words
fiasngs