The nations should ban international organizations from setting
workplaceFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and
occupationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, in
wayAdd an article
show examples
to save national trading. I disagree with the statement because it raises the economic
of the
and
provideChange the verb form
show examples
many job opportunities for local
.
To commence with, international companies
increasesCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
the financial
of the nation . To set up an organization in
otherCorrect quantifier usage
show examples
nationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
businesses
manCorrect your spelling
show examples
need to invest money and
need to pay taxes
the Correct article usage
show examples
productivity.
, the past prime minister of India
late Correct word choice
show examples
Mr Manmohan Singh introduced
openCorrect article usage
show examples
economy ( globalization) and invited foreign
companyFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to invest
as
,Remove the comma
show examples
Vodaphone and
CocaCorrect your spelling
show examples
- Cola that result in
boostingWrong verb form
show examples
economic
.
Another reason is that it helps in developing employment for local residents. When a foreign
establishChange the verb form
show examples
occupation
at the same time they need workers for work and hire local
because they
didWrong verb form
show examples
not need to pay high wages to them
if they call workers from their own
they need to provide every
facilitiesChange to a singular noun
show examples
and
need to pay in dollars which can cost them a lot
they hire local
.
, the
in
indiaChange the capitalization
show examples
have more Indian
and very few
foreignerReplace the word
show examples
workers.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement of banning foreign companies because they provide multifarious benefits to the
as economic
by investing and
solve the problem of unemployment by providing job vacancies.