There is no denying that governments should allocate funds to education. Some people look upon expenditures spent on science as a better policy, compared to other subjects. As far as I am concerned, I am strongly opposed to
this
argument, and the reasons will be thoroughly explained as follows.
Linking Words
To begin
with, not all students are interested in science, so some groups of people will be treated unfairly if the authorities fail to spend money on a diverse syllabus. Linking Words
That is
to say, those who are passionate about other fields like arts or literature will be underserved. Linking Words
For example
, I have been dreaming about pursuing a career as a professional dancer since I was a child. Linking Words
However
, decades ago, the Taiwanese government implemented regulations that maintained financial support only for science and technology programs. Linking Words
As a result
, I had no option but to give up my aspiration Linking Words
due to
lacking enough savings for Linking Words
further
advanced training lessons.
It is widely accepted that individuals tend to select a major catering to the job market; Linking Words
therefore
, there is a risk of an imbalance in human resources in the future. Linking Words
According to
a study from National Taiwan University, about 70 per cent of job opportunities in Taiwan are related to semiconductors and software services, which results in the majority of Taiwanese teenagers preferring to learn physics, mathematics, and programming. Linking Words
On the other hand
, businesses like publishers or restaurants are now facing challenges in not being able to hire enough well-trained employees.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned, funding for schools should be distributed to various subjects for the sake of benefiting every student and protecting every business.Linking Words
gurdeep9905