The bar graphs illustrate the data of the average change in the cost of homes since 1989 across five different areas over a period of 12
years
, from 1990 to 2002.
Use synonyms
Overall
, the period is split into the first and second half. Linking Words
It is clear that
the latter half had a higher increase in house prices than the first half as there are a higher number of cities that had a rise in payment. Linking Words
However
, Tokyo was the only place that had a decrease in price throughout.
In the first 6 Linking Words
years
, from 1990 to 1995, Tokyo and London had the largest drop in house value, both decreasing by more than 5%. New York Use synonyms
also
had a fall of 5% since 1989. Linking Words
On the other hand
, Madrid and Frankfurt had a slight increase in proportion, between 0 to 5% of the price in 1989.
From 1996 to 2002, with the exception of Frankfurt, all prices had a positive development. Houses in London had the most significant difference in amount, drastically growing from less than negative 5% in 1995 to more than 10% Linking Words
at the end
of the time period. Linking Words
Similarly
, New York, which had a negative increase of 5%, grew twice as much in the next 6 Linking Words
years
, to an additional expense of 5%. Use synonyms
While
houses in Madrid became more expensive, the change in payment still remained below 5%. Linking Words
In addition
, Tokyo houses had a negative change in cost, but from 1996 to 2002, it became slightly more expensive, with a negative difference of 5%. Linking Words
However
, Frankfurt experienced a small decline in percentage in the Linking Words
years
1996 to 2002.Use synonyms
Kaylagohxy