Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

4.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
Nowadays, some
people
Use synonyms
think that society can do nothing to improve the
environment
Use synonyms
,
while
Linking Words
governments and large companies can make a difference. From my perspective, I totally agree with
this
Linking Words
statement because they can impose taxes
regarding
Change preposition
on
show examples
nature
Use synonyms
and
can
Verb problem
apply
show examples
allocate funds for
this
Linking Words
issue.
Body paragraph 1
The main reason for
this
Linking Words
view is that they have the right to establish new legislation about the
environment
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
is because
,
Punctuation problem
apply
show examples
people
Use synonyms
lose the
environment
Use synonyms
in different ways,
such
Linking Words
as
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
, deforestation, and land use, which is damaging our ecosystem.
In addition
Linking Words
to these factors, individuals tend to look after
Earth
Add an article
the Earth
show examples
, which makes
this
Linking Words
situation
wors
Correct your spelling
worse
Body paragraph 2
e.
As a result
Linking Words
, if the government were to apply new laws regarding the
environment
Use synonyms
,
they
Fix the agreement mistake
it
show examples
would notice that the levels of
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
and deforestation would drop significantly
due to
Linking Words
the laws. A case in point is that
,
Punctuation problem
apply
show examples
the government of Uzbekistan used a law, which consists of using land without permission from the government, which should take action and introduce statistics, which should not lead to
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
.
Body paragraph 3
The second idea is that they can allocate
money
Use synonyms
to protect the
environment
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
means that society can collect a group of
people
Use synonyms
who want to improve
nature
Use synonyms
with their knowledge, but there is a drawback of a substantial
fund, without
Replace the word
funding
money
Use synonyms
, they don't have the opportunity to do something.
Additionally
Linking Words
, sometimes they cannot collect a sufficient number of
people
Use synonyms
who are ready to help.
Consequently
Linking Words
, companies or governments can give
money
Use synonyms
to organizations, who's job is to care for the
environment
Use synonyms
, or they can spend
money
Use synonyms
on
nature
Use synonyms
with new trees or flowers or even new species of animals.
For example
Linking Words
, in 2024, the USA spent about $200 millions of dollars to preserve
nature
Use synonyms
from the existence of trees and animals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I firmly agree with
this
Linking Words
statement since governments can make new legislation regarding the use of land or levels of
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
from factories , and they can allocate public funds to preserve some of the species.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Give a clear answer in the first paragraph and keep the same view all through the essay. Your view is clear, but the first line says that society can do nothing. This is too strong and does not fully match your later idea that people can help but need money.
task response
Explain why people cannot make a difference by themselves, and why their small acts are still useful. This will make your answer more complete and fair.
task response
Make each main idea more clear. For example, say that governments can make laws and punish firms that pollute, while large firms can change how they make and sell things.
task response
Use examples that are clear and true. The Uzbekistan example is hard to understand because the law and its result are not explained well. The USA example needs a clear source or a more general example.
coherence and cohesion
Use a simple plan: introduction, one paragraph about laws, one paragraph about money and company action, then conclusion. Your essay has this shape, but some ideas inside each paragraph are not in a clear order.
coherence and cohesion
Start each body paragraph with one main point. Then explain it, give one example, and show the result. Do not put many new ideas in the same sentence.
coherence and cohesion
Link ideas with clear words such as “First”, “Also”, “For example”, and “Therefore”. Some links are used, but they do not always show the right relation between ideas.
coherence and cohesion
Write shorter sentences. For example, the sentence about the Uzbekistan law has too many parts, so the reader cannot see your point. Split it into two or three short sentences.
coherence and cohesion
Check words that refer to people or groups. Use “governments and large companies” instead of “they” when the meaning may not be clear. Also, use “whose job” rather than “who’s job”.
task response
You give a direct view and support it with two main reasons: making laws and giving money.
task response
Your conclusion repeats your main view and the key points from the body.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear beginning, two body paragraphs, and an ending.
coherence and cohesion
You use some helpful link words, such as “As a result”, “Consequently”, and “For example”.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: