People have different view points on the government spending money on artists as this is not the direct contiribution to improvement of the community. In addition to that, they believe that artists should be capable enou
There is a dilemma should the government give financial help to artists, such as musicians, writers or painters. Is it profitable or is it just a waste of money? In my opinion, investments in art activities could be econ
Some people argue about the impact of artist life like musicians, writers also painters and how the Government have to taking responsibility as support for their celebrities. May this is give more efficient income for th
Some individuals contend the notion that encouraging authority to several celebrities, such as musicians, authors, and painters would be beneficial to increasing the economy of some regions. I argue the standpoint that
Is it sensible for the power to fund troupes, including musicians, writers, and painters? Is it an economically sound decision or would it be a waste of money? In my opinion, a supporting list will surely contribute to a
Nowadays, many artists are funded by the government to develop their careers, and it is valuable to support the micro-economy. Although some people think that this will destroy the amount of money. I believe that this wi
At the present time, the authority should develop an entertainment background. Overall, I personally agree with that statement about growing up economically and developing knowledge about digitalization.
In contemporary society,it is argued whether the government helps artists like singers,writers,composers and painters or not.Is it advantageous or not in terms of finances?
Art is a vital part of our culture and tradition and artists act as servants of artwork. It became a debatable issue whether helping troupe is effective or is just ruining the economy. In this essay, I will outline the