Human activities directly affect the the surroundings. It is considered that masses will not be ready to adapt to immidiate shifts in their day-to-day life to improve environment , so regime should interfare and make str
There are some people who argue that the government must force its citizens to make significant improvement of lifestyle changes to control climate change. The argument stems from the negative habit of the civilians who
Society will hardly adjust their way of living suddenly on their own for the sake of the climate crisis, therefore it is necessary for the government to forcefully make this adjustment. I completely agree with the statem
It is very ostensible that human beings will never change there life-style for a good cause like limiting the effect of climate change. Hence, to prevent any disastrous catastrophe, the government is liable to take actio
Nowadays, climate change is around the world, and people are becoming more and more aware of how our way of lifestyle is destroying the earth's ecology and biodiversity, but also feeling the inability to climate change.
The question of whether individuals can be motivated to make the significant lifestyle adjustments required to address climate change is a subject of debate. This essay seeks to evaluate both perspectives, offering evide
Nowadays, every country facing climate change problems is huge and people do not want to make changes in their lifestyles the way their lives required to combat global warming .According to this matter, the governments
Humans do not want to make the changes in the way their lives require to combat humidity transformation.According to this , the ministry must do the same agreement and regulations to affect the temperature revolution.Ind
No huge alters and modifications in the lifestyle of people will not be done by individuals to deal with major problems of humidity change. According to this, it is a "must" thing for the state to make them to do this