A large number of countries are trying to preserve animals in the best way; however, many people argue, that is pointless to expend money, time and other resources for conserving wild animals in the and there is no place
The majority of people argue that especially wild animals have no place in the 21st century, although being the vital part of our planet. Under this circumstance they possess the belief spending money to preserve animals
Despite being the vital part of our planet, the majority of people argue that especially wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Under this circumstances they possess the belief spending money to preserve animals
Up to the understanding of some people, fauna, which live far from humans, will have no room for living. therefore, allocating money to protect them is useless, which I completely disagree with this assertion.
Some people believe that is pointless to care animals in the 21st century because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
When the issue of wildlife protection comes into view, there exist conflicting opinions. Some people claim that preserving wild animals serves no purpose, however, I totally disagree with this point of view.
Wild animals are losing their habitats, which is occupied by the increasing number of human beings. Some people supported that government should invest money in protecting endangered animals, it would help to keep those
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that w
In the times in which we now live,some opine that wild life preservation is not necessary and spending money is pointless.i completely disagree with this view.
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no plac
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular ce
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular ce
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because humans do not need them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
Humans across history are increasingly suffering from wars and planet destruction. The advent of nuclear power made life safer and provided cheaper and environment-friendly energy sources. This essay will discuss why I s
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that
It is a nasty fact that people believe that the animals would not have any place to live in the next century and so, these days do not consider saving wild life as their utmost priority.
Some people argue that it is needless to conserve wildlife, as it is a wasteful use of resources. I disagree with this notion as I believe that this idea is selfish and unethical. At the same time, its protection is enti
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
It is argued that wildlife creatures plays nothing in our modern life so that the effortless of conservating them make a huge wasting of human resources. While I accept that suit many people, I believe that those kind o
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wildlife because we haumans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.