Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that young people should lead companies instead of the older ones. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement because those aged staffs with experiences can bring more advantages for a group. It is obvious that experienced people have expert power - which can hardly be found in a young leader, to give right directions to their subordinates in work. As a result, an efficient working routine with controllable outcomes will be set up, making a better reputation for company. Furthermore, when an unexpected problem happens, an aged senior staff will be more quickly to find a feasible solution than the younger one since their problem-solving skill has been developed through years. For example, when facing an on-site issue in construction industry, a 20 years experience architect can sit at the office and tell the workers exactly what they can do. Meanwhile, it will take a lot of time for a 5 years leader to find the same solution. Some people claim that young managers will be more creative in work and can propose positive changes for the improvement of company. Although this opinion is true in some cases, creativity also can be contributed by those older people in many ways. One effective method is that these senior staffs can encourage young employee to conduct their own ideas in working. By doing this, a strong relationship of mentor and mentee will be set to achieve something new in a productive way: the old will help the young on practical side of new idea. In conclusion, I believe that old individuals should be chosen to lead a company rather than the young for certain reasons mentioned above.
Submitted by The expense of living is higher in developed nations and it affects directly to citizens and society. In this essay, I will express this issue and some resolves. People living in the US or any European country would face daily expensive cost and it affects directly to every citizen and society. Firstly, It forces adult individuals to work in most of the time and takes away enjoyable moments in their lives. For instance, a direct salesman in car dealers usually conducts their tasks from 6 am to 8 pm to maximum volume of sales and meet daily costs. Secondly, this fact creates a bunch of homeless people, who come from both white-collar and blue-collar workers. In Silicon Valley, teachers, bankers or staffs of governments live in track, which is normal images that local people see every day. The best way is that governments and corporation must act together. In the US, authorities in some province encourage real estate companies to build more houses and apartments, they act to remove and shrink terms, conditions in certain sectors. Some also decrease business tax massively to attract large conglomerate. It results in thousands of apartments, house, which appear at the edge of cities or state. Let’s take Google corporation is an example, they proactively associated with state government and sponsor to provide low-cost houses in Silicon Valley for their employees and valley citizens. High cost in developed countries and other issues always happens in different contexts, hence individuals, corporation, and authorities must act and take their responsibility in life and our society. on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users