Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of lower positions in the same company. To what extent do you agree?

It is often argued by many that employees higher up in the organizational command chain being paid more
in contrast
to those lower down in command is a positive trend. I fully believe that paying CEO's and FA's more money than new recruits is completely justified.
Firstly
, those higher up in the hierarchy have been working for many more years than those lower down.
Therefore
, they offer more experience. Which means, they are more valuable to companies and have more to offer in terms of knowledge and wisdom.
In addition
to
this
, their positions require more effort and skills that they have acquired over time. For
this
reason they should be compensated financially for their hard duties.
Furthermore
, these employees usually work longer hours and take their work home.
This
is exemplified by Microsoft, Bill gates, the CEO of the organization, who is on duty 18 hours per day, as well as, has the most computer knowledge background as opposed to the people working underneath him.
Consequently
, he is paid 6 million dollars per year. Overall, it is good that employees are paid based on how much they deserve.
Secondly
, when junior staff sees their seniors earning so much, they are encouraged to work harder to reach their positions. Creating a sense of encouragement and motivation, in turn, they become more ambitious.
Although
their monthly allowance is not as high, it is fair, because they know through perseverance they will climb up in the system.
For instance
, a world known publication in 2016, Maslows hierarchy of needs, puts self- actualization at the top of the chart, above esteem,
this
means that people are motivated to push forward and become recognized,
thus
earning more as they go along. Overall, those in lower positions are worthy of lower salaries. In conclusion, the reimbursement of top dog employees with bigger fortunes as opposed to new interns is an overall an advantageous progression.
Submitted by leena_lik.ey on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: