Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intentions of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your conclusion on which side you favour.

Laws prohibiting the deliberate inhalation of
in public spaces have been passed by some nations, while some other nations have no plan of doing the same. In as much as, both sides have solid arguments to back their stance, I am of the opinion that there are more merits than demerits and
essay will explore both sides of the argument while concluding on which side I favour.
To begin
with, the prohibition of
smoking in public spaces tends to reduce the rate of
smoking which
Accept comma addition
smoking, which
has been shown to be hazardous to the human lungs and is among the leading causes of lung cancer. When smokers are prevented from smoking in
work places
a place where work is done
or eateries, the non-smokers that frequent those places are spared from
the the
definite article
heinous effects of
, smokers who are trying to quit smoking are inadvertently forced to do so, as they are mandated by law not to smoke in certain places.
, they are able to face fewer temptations throughout the
day especially
Accept comma addition
day, especially
in public places and in so doing are able to go through their resolve to quit smoking.
, nations that have failed to pass laws prohibiting
smoking in public
spaces consider
Accept comma addition
spaces, consider
the economic benefits of
and how these laws may affect it negatively. They argue that the consumption of
tends to fall when smokers are being mandated to stop smoking in public spaces which affects the overall sales of
In addition
, they
claim that the number of workers experiencing withdrawal symptoms during working hours
increases which
Accept comma addition
increases, which
translates to a decrease in office productivity. They claim that workers may face low concentration, anxiety which are symptoms of withdrawal from smoking
in turn tends to drastically reduce their performance at work. In conclusion, the prohibition of smoking
in public spaces
work places
a place where work is done
and eateries have benefits which I
accept as true; take to be true
outweigh the drawbacks.
Submitted by kennethonwuachu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Turn your IELTS writing into band 7+
Writing9 scans your text for all types of mistakes, from typos to sentence structure problems and beyond.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays:
Turn your IELTS writing into band 7+
Hundreds of algorithms will assess your writing according to 4 evaluation criteria. Writing9 helps you find the weak points of your essay and make it flawless.