Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?

In
this
increasingly competitive society, academic certification degrees are considered to be more essential than hands-on experience by some employers when they seek new candidates.
Although
there are some underlying reasons for
this
, I still believe that
this
is completely a negative movement. There are two factors to explain why some job recruiters prefer university qualifications to life experience when recruiting new employees.
Firstly
, in many professions, formal academic degrees seem to be the top priority of many employers when selecting new applicants. In order to become a doctor,
for example
, a candidate has to acquire a great deal of medical knowledge at university as well as spend plenty of time to practice and carry out experiments.
Secondly
,
this
trend might be a great way to save time for employee recruiters. Compared to formal academic candidates who are likely ready to start working, employees may have to spend months on training non-academic applicants how to work properly.
Therefore
,
this
saved months can be used in other valuable ways.
However
, I think that
this
is a negative development and both academic and non-academic job hunters should receive an equal chance in the recruitment process.
This
is because many people decide to work right after school
instead
of starting tertiary education in order to gain life skills and practical experience. On top of that, after a long time of working in a real work environment, people are
also
capable of doing most assigned tasks without a formal academic education. The typical example can be seen in the case of Steve Jobs, a founder of Apple, who was the most successful person in the technology industry without holding any formal education in
this
field. In conclusion,
this
trend is attributable to two main reasons, and I believe that
this
is a negative progress for the above-mentioned arguments.
Submitted by Hg Alexander on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • standardized measure
  • specialized expertise
  • dedication
  • long-term goal
  • higher education
  • practical skills
  • adaptability
  • problem-solving abilities
  • communication skills
  • teamwork
  • leadership
  • homogeneous
  • diverse perspectives
  • negative development
  • inequality
  • valuable skills
  • insights
  • balanced approach
  • proficiency
  • safety standards
  • candidate's profile
What to do next:
Look at other essays: