Some people think that government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Science

is the most important subject at the academic level, some people believe that the government should direct more budget to

science

than any other field. Personally, I fundamentally agree with their belief because

science

is vital for progress and every country must have enough scientists in every subject. The importance in

science

appears clearly on engineering and technology, engineering will help every country to improve their ways of study, building, and even in media because engineers create equipment which help accelerates all researches and make the scientific breakthroughs more achievable,

similarly

, technology is immense to exploit the resources and use them for the development of the society and the economy,

for instance

, china started their famous industrial revolution after the invested a considerable amount of their budget in

science

,

as a result

now they lead the world on

i

Add an article

the

show examples

ndustry. Another point to consider, when the authorities concentrate on promoting

science

the will have a sizable lead on the numbers of competent scientists, some might argue that

this

way may be the country might have more scientists more than they actually need,

however

, I believe

this

could become leverage as they can send them to

third

world countries and help them use their resources in exchange of taking some of the profits,

for example

, china assisted the Sudanese government to transport their oil for a significant amount of the revenue. To sump up, promoting

science

is the optimum way to improve and support your economy advancements an to have a progressive type of governmental technology .