Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Companies provide employment to

the

Change the article

a

show examples

large number of people. The success of any business depends on the quality of the staff so employers conduct the

interview

to select new workers. Few individuals think that

interview

is not only a way to appoint somebody on a

job

. I disagree with the given statement, which says that

i

Add an article

an

the

show examples

nterview is not a reliable

method

but there are other better methods

also

for hiring

e

Add an article

an

show examples

mployee in a

company

.

To begin

with, there are numerous reasons that why

i

Add an article

the

show examples

nterview is being always preferred by the big enterprises; because it is a face-to-face communication where an employer who held the

interview

and an

employee

answered the questions regarding

to

Remove the preposition

apply

show examples

his field.

Moreover

, a

person

who is taking the

interview

can easily

judged

Change the verb form

judge

show examples

the personality traits

such

as skills, confidence,

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

, IQ, self-awareness, self-confidence, attitude and many more. After reviewing the qualities of an interviewee the interviewer put the right

person

on

a

Change the article

the

show examples

right

job

accordingly

to his traits. Big companies like reliance

company

appointed their workers through taking an

interview

and

accordingly

to their studies it is a

mention worthy

Add a hyphen

mention-worthy

show examples

example to cite over here.

Hence

,

this

is the main aspect that why

i

Add an article

the

show examples

nterview is being preferred. Admittedly, if

f

Add an article

the

a

show examples

ace-to-face talk is not a dependable

method

to recruit a

person

on a

job

then

there are multifarious methods which can be used to appoint an individual on a

job

.

Firstly

,

w

Add an article

the

show examples

ritten test

method

can be applied by the large companies for recruiting the workers in which

multiple choice

Add a hyphen

multiple-choice

show examples

questions would be given to them for testing their knowledge and capability of understanding.

Secondly

, assessment centres would be preferred in which the team activities would be done as well as

competancy

Correct your spelling

competency

based skills would be judged. It is a good paradigm to mention here is in the field of marketing these tests would be mostly applied in which

employee

traits can be judged. Ergo, that are some tests which are better than the

interview

. From my book of experience, I think so that the face-to-face conversation is better than the other tests which are applied because in an

interview

a

Change the article

an

show examples

interviewer can easily

judged

Change the verb form

judge

show examples

the personal traits of the

person

whilst through the other tests which are applied a

person

can only

Change the verb form

be

show examples

judged

Change the form of the verb

judge

show examples

about the knowledge of that

person

in the particular field. If a

company

applied both of these tests would be too expensive that a

company

can not conduct these to hire an

employee

. In a conclusion, I do not agree with that the

interview

is not a reliable

method

while other methods are better. In some situations, conducting

i

Add an article

an

the

show examples

nterview is more apt and in some situations

Add a comma

,

show examples

the other methods may be more advantageous.