Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Health and fitness are a really vital factor in someone's life. Nowadays, many companies are thinking about their staff health condition and

thus

incentive them by subscription membership of gyms and sports clubs. While some employers see a great benefit on it owing to enhancing worker’s

productivity

and approaching

team

members, others argue that it is an unnecessary aspect of work. On the one hand, companies which offer the impellent plan for the

team

are focused on achieving personal best.

This

is because research has shown that regularly doing exercises will save a person’s health, prolong life and, in that way, employees will be able to increase

productivity

. A good illustration for

this

is associations in China and Japan which encourage their workers to do physical activities during the work process to avoid fatigue.

In addition

, if most people do exercises in groups, they will able to bring staff together.

For example

,

this

is the one way CEO all over the world provide

team

building activities.

On the other hand

, job givers that do not ensure subsidized membership think their profits can be used elsewhere, namely in bonuses or to increase

productivity

.

For instance

, some companies focus on free health care rather than on incentives and

thus

motive their workers by issuing a money bonus.

This

can reduce a person’s involvement in the work process and determine deterioration mood in the group. In conclusion, if employers do not offer sports clubs subscription, they will make a loss more than a profit.

Nevertheless

, associations which ensure these are in the advantage due to enhancing worker’s

productivity

and approaching

team

members.