Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What is your opinion?

Its is often believed that the staff member who
have
Change the verb form
has
show examples
worked a while in a corporation, should get a promotion to a high spot in the corporation. In my opinion, workers that worked for a long period
oftime
Correct your spelling
of time
shouldn'
t
be the only one open to getting promoted. They should get rewarded to a bigger place in the company solely by judging their skills and hard
work
.
Although
it is true that members that worked longer should be prioritized for years of loyalty to the company,
but
Remove the conjunction
apply
show examples
even though that should not mean that neglecting the new worker is the solution for
this
scenario. I highly believe promoting job workers by evaluating them by the amount of time they have worked is not fair, because it doesn'
t
justify employee getting promoted by the period of time given, they should get promoted by they worked and their skills level. In the recent statistics, in the USA it is shown that the new member
perform
Change the verb form
performs
show examples
much harder than the old
office
workers ,
however
Add a comma
,however
show examples
they still do not receive any promotion or incentives, regardless of how hard they
work
.
This
often leads them being demoralized and unmotivated to give their hundred per cent to
work
. When working in big corporates companies, clerks have high expectations and dreams to soar high. While
on the other hand
, the
office
employee who
have
Change the verb form
has
show examples
worked longer, even after getting promoted, they wouldn'
t
change much at how they
work
in the future, due to having the confidence in their secured position and the amount of time they worked. In conclusion, I disagree with giving
further
high advancements in the corporate companies to
older
Add an article
the older
an older
show examples
employee, even though they have worked much longer, that shouldn'
t
be enough for them to get a higher standing in the
office
. I believe giving higher advancements to
work
Add the preposition
forwork
show examples
staff solely based on their competence, hard
work
, and skills will create a perfect balance in the
office
.
Submitted by shizza1812 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: