Interview forms the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree?

In the modern world, traditionally, in order to get a job in a good place, people need to go through a series of interviews.
This
practice is quite universal and many companies use it. Despite everything,
this
method has a number of disadvantages and advantages. In spite of the advantages, I think a meeting is a good path. Advocates of the method believe that today at the time, when a huge number of people are fighting for equality and diversity, a universal approach to recruiting can be the key to a successful business. Another good thing about interviews is HR specialists should not prepare to examine every candidate separately. It makes the process of recruiting more simple and faster. And
finally
, the
third
reason why conferences are a fine practice for future employees can make ready and answer some common questions before face-to-face communication and it helps them to be more confident and relaxed during the interview. There are,
however
, some disadvantages. Common approaches for recruiting may not take into account the personal qualities of a job applicant. A talented but timid
person
may suffer from
such
an interview where he or she will feel uncomfortable. Another bad thing in the interview is monotony. A lot of men and women say the same things day after day. Either because it is taught in the courses, or because humans think that it will be better if they say common phrases,
however
, it often happens that a
person
goes through a dozen interviews in different companies, but does not find a job. In my opinion, there are maybe better ways of tackling
this
problem.
For instance
, HR specialists can approach recruiting in a more personalized way. Every
person
is unique and if the company wants to be cool, modern and successful,
then
this
company should take into account the capabilities of each
person
working in it. In the end, happy people work much better.
Submitted by ktpchkv on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: