In many schools and universities today, women have a tendency to study the humanities (such as the arts and languages) while men more often major in science related subjects. Some believe this tendency should be changed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The question of whether the gender distribution in school

subjects

should be modified as today female students tend to pick up art

subjects

while their male counterparts are more likely to take up science

subjects

. In my opinion, whilst

this

notion seems legitimate, there is little value in executing

this

change

. On the one hand, the most frequently cited rationale for remedying

this

imbalance is the social barrier.

This

argument rests on the fact that women historically had given up their education and careers to male siblings and husbands.

For example

,

this

can be most apparently seen in myriad male role models pursuing scientific aspiration, while women were more likely to excel in the arts. Leading to the current time, there has been a list of studies proclaiming that men are way better than women at science.

Thus

, the accumulated evidence has reasoned why

this

social factor obstructing equal opportunities is the driving force for

this

imbalanced ratio.

On the other hand

, albeit conceding the social aspect presented behind

this

development, I would still contend that heavily-handed efforts to force

change

could be detrimental to both genders.

This

is predicated on the assumption that each individual has unique personal qualities that are suitable for certain

subjects

and occupations, indicating that they should have freedom of choice in tertiary education.

For instance

, one of the salient illustrations of

this

can be clearly witnessed in numerous universities, which have been limiting a quota in a couple of majors for females.

This

might place less qualified candidates over more deserving ones, later resulting in less productivity in the workplace due to fewer opportunities given to those aspirants.

Therefore

, enforcing

this

change

does not confer a valid standpoint as reducing the student's choice of

subjects

could bring in resentment and

further

social instability. In conclusion, while all reforms to offer equal educational opportunities should be welcomed, attempts to

change

the tendency could bring more harm than good. In my final thought, educators and career advisors should jointly propose a more holistic approach in order to encourage students to pursue their passions.