Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over the top position in organizations should be allocated more for
women
. While
this
statement is valid to some extent, I partially agree with
this
idea. On the one hand, it is undisputed that
women
not only can deal with others better than
men
but
also
can avoid conflict between workers and employers. In spite of using violence when they do business or talk with people in some argumentative problems,
women
frequently choose a smooth way to negotiate , which makes either their partners feel comfortable and satisfied or their employees
also
feel happy too .
Hence
, it can act as a precursor for both
women
and their corporations to avoid a serious conflict, which can contribute to a wealth of riots inside their factories, or even destroy those companies.
Therefore
,
women
, who create a friendly environment inside or outside their workplace, deserve to hold high-position in the institutions.
On the other hand
, while a great many benefits
women
can carry out for people are widely acknowledged,
men
also
can do wonders for those when they hold important situations in the companies.
Women
leaders tend to be easily influenced by their emotional instabilities, which may remarkably pose a threat to their important decisions.
On the contrary
,
men
can considerably control their emotions, which plays a paramount significant role to help them make more rational decisions. In fact, during mankind’s history, the majority of leaders, who lead societies within their chaotic periods, belong to
men
such
as Ho Chi Minh, Vo Nguyen Giap, Washington, or V. D. Putin.
Thus
,
men
can make an electric mix of splendid decisions and take the lead of corporations to make them wealthier. In conclusion, both
men
and
women
can greatly contribute to the fostering of their institutions,
therefore
, the proportion of top positions should be allocated equally for 2 genders.
Submitted by thuhuong3031999 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • gender disparity
  • glass ceiling
  • workforce representation
  • gender diversity
  • equal opportunity
  • professional advancement
  • social equality
  • gender equality
  • empowerment
  • barrier
  • discrimination
  • inequality
  • bias
  • reinforce
  • inclusive
  • combat
  • strive for
  • promote
  • nurture
  • enhance
  • progressive
  • implement
  • quota system
What to do next:
Look at other essays: