Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women To what extent do you agree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It's clearly evident that in many companies the prior post is occupied by male workers, despite the majority of the population, which is able to work, is composed by women, totalizing more than a half in almost all
first
Linking Words
world countries. Institutions, for some people, should depart a portion of the high-level positions to women and
this
Linking Words
might be a requirement.
However
Linking Words
, in my opinion, allocating a certain percentage of these places may increase the already existing disparity among gender.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, the merit of occupying an important office should be evaluated by the results of exceptional work as well as the way that each person deals with reaching the goals of the given task.
This
Linking Words
talent could be considered since it is particularly significant as an employer's figure, mainly when is required to choose someone for a specific service.
For instance
Linking Words
, we can illustrate that using for the selection of athletes for a football team.
First
Linking Words
, the coach always chooses the most talented of all players.
Then
Linking Words
, he might give chance for the rest with a particular ability to play.
Thus
Linking Words
, the style of each athlete is unique,
consequently
Linking Words
, what really matters is figures which make the athlete able to do the best football game.
Nevertheless
Linking Words
, there are personalities' differences in each gender, which is completely natural and physiological, that could influence their work performance.
Therefore
Linking Words
, merit, again, should be the main requirement for a visible position.
This
Linking Words
problem may be solved if the sex of the candidate wouldn't be known by who is the selector.
For example
Linking Words
, if the curriculum or the application form will fill without names, but just with the qualities of the person, it wouldn't be necessary to reserve positions for any gender. In conclusion, changing the company standards just to increase the chances of a woman assuming a relevant place in
this
Linking Words
one, is not the solution for
this
Linking Words
question. There are other options that might be taken to change
this
Linking Words
sad reality in many organizations of developed countries.
Submitted by lufemurta on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Gender diversity
  • Affirmative action
  • Meritocracy
  • Quotas
  • Glass ceiling
  • Legal enforcement
  • Tokenism
  • Voluntary measures
  • Career progression
  • Representation
  • Workforce parity
  • Backlash
  • Historical imbalances
  • Corporate governance
  • Inclusive practices
  • Boardroom dynamics
  • Gender norms
  • Unconscious bias
  • Regulatory frameworks
  • Corporate ladder
What to do next:
Look at other essays: