`Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do u agree or disagree?

As the world

witnesses

Correct your spelling

witnessed

show examples

the enormous growth of the private sector, an increasing number of firms are being established every day.

This

increase is accompanied by

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

higher demand for

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

, particularly in executive

positions

. Some argue that

positions

of authority in an

organization

should be given to young

people

instead

of older

people

like they traditionally have been. Personally, I disagree with

this

opinion.

First

, older

leaders

have many years of experience, and

this

is of critical importance to leading an

organization

or a community. Their experience can help their

organization

avoid potential losses or crises because they are more likely to have dealt with

this

kind of

situations

Fix the agreement mistake

situation

show examples

in the past. At the same time, they can save the

company

a considerable amount of money because their experience means they know how to get things done in the most efficient manner. Examples of how experienced CEOs and directors help salvage unprofitable startups are plentiful in the technology industry, with Amazon being a prime example. In its nascent stage, the

company

demonstrated explosive growth but did not actually make any money because it was poorly managed; it was not until more senior

leaders

and experts joined the ranks did Amazon improve its bottom line and become a

company

that was actually considered desirable on the market.

Moreover

, young individuals’ carelessness and impatience can be major disadvantages when they are given a leadership role prematurely. On a practical level, someone who loses their temper or composure easily can be regarded by the

people

that they lead to be unreliable, and

this

attitude of subordinates will be a particularly difficult obstacle when one tries to lead a team. In terms of the

organization

that they work for, a young leader who is rash, quick to jump to conclusions and constantly makes mistakes can end up costing the

company

dearly.

Additionally

, while many endorse young

leaders

for their creativity and enthusiasm, a critical fact that bears repeating is that young

people

often lack the drive to advance to these

positions

in the

first

place. Most of the youth nowadays champion a life

that is

stress-free, and because of that the hardships and the emotional burden associated with being a leader often discourages them from trying to attain these

positions

.

Hence

, the majority of executive

positions

in companies nowadays are still filled by predominantly older staff. In conclusion, older

leaders

have always been

favored

Change the spelling

favoured

show examples

in companies, and I believe

this

practice is perfectly justified.