Interviews are the basic selecting criteria for most companies. However, some people think interviews are not a reliable method and there are better methods. Do you agree or disagree?
As the economy is advancing by leaps and bounds, the attitude people adopt towards recruitment has undergone a noticeable and far-reaching transformation. Under
this
circumstance, an absolute consensus is hardly reached as to whether there are other effective alternatives to Linking Words
interviews
which have been fundamental choosing standards. For my part, I side with the advocates to a larger extent based on the following sound reasons.
Use synonyms
Firstly
, it is noteworthy that conversations fail to make a comprehensive assessment of job-seekers. Nowadays, many studies have shown that Linking Words
although
it is invisible, Linking Words
the
meeting in person can not make the evaluation of the honesty, loyalty and trustworthiness of applicants because of limited interaction in a short period of time. Correct article usage
apply
Therefore
, it Linking Words
will
be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that Wrong verb form
would
interviews
are not the most dependable method for recruitment. Use synonyms
For example
, in some countries where employers give high weight to whole-life employment, reference from current employees is widely applied to recruit new staff rather than public advertisement and Linking Words
interviews
. Use synonyms
This
example is Linking Words
the
illustration of the fact that talking is not a totally reliable method for some inherited shortcomings.
Correct article usage
an
Secondly
, the counter-argument raised by objectors is that without meeting job-seekers can not show off their abilities, and experiences. Linking Words
This
belief could be attributed to the fact that in large measure, conversations have been widely used to check the richness of capabilities Linking Words
such
as interpersonal interaction skills, resilience and critical thinking Linking Words
skill
via giving questions and requiring immediate answers. Fix the agreement mistake
skills
This
argument is true to some degree; Linking Words
however
, it is incomplete, what they fail to take into account is that meetings can not go Linking Words
further
to check criminal records or bank credit. Linking Words
For instance
, Linking Words
according to
some research, when it comes to fulfilling vacancies for managers, directors, and chief officers; most companies are inclined to use services provided by head-hunting companies because these companies are specialized in seeking highly qualified workers with special tools, professional means.
In conclusion, I am convinced that there are more productive methods to recruit new personnel than Linking Words
interviews
for the reasons mentioned above. From Use synonyms
this
point, people need to prepare a good quality thoroughly to achieve their career target and successfully pass all the company's criteria.Linking Words
Submitted by daisyle1811 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Your essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and provides clear arguments both in support of and against the use of interviews as a method for selecting candidates. However, be sure to directly address the question prompt and maintain a clear focus on the topic throughout the essay.
Coherence and Cohesion
Your essay shows overall good coherence and cohesion. Your ideas are logically connected, and there is a clear introduction and conclusion. To enhance this further, consider varying your transitions and ensuring that each paragraph contributes directly to the overall argument.