Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behaviour. What is your opinion?

These days, the amount of assault in publishing is growing. While some people argue that

this

trend will undoubtedly lead humans to a dangerous future, others claim that it has no damaging effect on society. I believe that in most cases media violence doesn't affect the population's behaviour.

Firstly

, I think that people act from their motives, regardless of what they see on the television.

That is

to say, if someone intends to do harm to somebody,

that is

not because of watching TV or playing computer games but due to that person's character and education.

Although

it is generally considered that violent media accustoms viewers to cruelty, I doubt

this

opinion. In my view, a reasonable and intelligent community treat others humanely irrespective of what they see or hear in fictional stories.

Moreover

, video games and TV sets may even reduce social brutality by providing a safe outlet for aggressiveness.

In other words

, the truculent population may fight in virtual reality

instead

of evincing their combative spirit in the real world.

This

may not only help those communities but

also

reduce the level of social violence from the long-term perspective.

Finally

, despite many claims and assumptions about the negative effects of television and computer games I have never seen any proven connection between violent media and illegal activities in social life. Taking everything into consideration, I would say that brutality in contemporary publishing has no substantial influence on the community's behaviour. TV sets and computers are not the main factors that shape personal character, and they can even be useful in reducing the level of assault.