Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Interviews
are commonly used as a way to screen candidates at large companies.
However
, some people argue that
interviews
are not an effective way to recruit employees. I agree that relying on
interviews
alone can lead to hiring the wrong professional.
However
, I believe that when used in combination with other assessment methods,
such
as
group
activities and quizzes,
interviews
can be a valuable tool in the hiring process. Organisations are increasingly using
group
activities to assess
applicants’
Correct your spelling
applicant’s
show examples
suitability for their roles.
This
allows them to see how potential employees react under pressure and how they handle conflict. These simulations give organisations a better understanding of the professional’s values, behaviours and thinking patterns. As candidates often lie in the interview and tend to act like robots answering the questions the way the recruiter expects, the information gathered in the
group
work can
then
be used alongside interview results to make final hiring decisions.
Secondly
, personality quizzes can be a useful tool for assessing job seekers' profiles and determining their strengths and weaknesses.
Such
tests can help to identify which aspirants are naturally good mediators and which ones will require more direction from others. If one of the criteria for the role is to hire someone with strong leadership skills,
then
mediators may be the best option. In conclusion, it's important to remember that no single method is perfect and that
interviews
are just one piece of the puzzle when it comes to recruiting. While they can provide valuable insights into an individual’s qualifications, it's important to use other methods as well to verify the information. As previously mentioned,
group
work and personality tests have proven to be effective tools to be used in combination with
interviews
for increasing the accuracy of the employment process.
Submitted by cdrmadeeasy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: