Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is undeniable that most companies rely on
interviews
for hiring new
employees
, but some people believe that
this
dependence on
interviews
is wrong and that other alternatives should be preferred as they are better. I believe that
interviews
are a reliable method, and the other methods cannot be considered more effective. There are many reasons why
interviews
are suitable for hiring new
employees
.
Firstly
, through the interview, the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential
employees
. In
interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction, and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, from which personality traits can be judged.
Also
, by asking some case study-type questions,
employees
can judge traits like the ability to handle pressure, confidence and the ability to think outside the box.
In addition
,
although
there are many other methods for hiring, none of them could be considered superior to
interviews
.
One
Correct your spelling
On
show examples
Change preposition
of
show examples
the other common method is the written test, which is good to judge the theoretical knowledge of the person.
However
,
this
method cannot give a good idea about the personality of the candidate.
By contrast
, through
interviews
, employers can judge both the knowledge and temperament of the potential employee.
Moreover
, the written test is fallible to cheating as sometimes candidates can take outside help. Another selection process is a group discussion, which is good where a major job requirement is conversational and persuasion skills
for instance
sales jobs. They are really not suited for technical jobs because these are not customer oriented.
On the other hand
,
interviews
hold good for any type of job as the interviewer can frame questions to test the particular skills they require.
To conclude
, I would like to reiterate that the preference for
interviews
for hiring among employers is justified as
interviews
have advantages over other commonly adopted methods.
Submitted by manekiyaadil on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: