Employers should give their workers at least one month holiday a year as it makes them to do better at their job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, it is argued by some people that

employees

should be given at minimum a month off from their

job

in order to achieve efficiency. Vacations surely are paramount, but some negative implications arise from them.

To begin

, people receiving one month's holiday are more relaxed and calm at their workplaces. As entertainment is really essential for a healthy

work

/life balance, some vacations in a year make personnel working in a particular company more productive and motivated.

For instance

,

this

is more motivating than pay increments, perks, or financial rewards

such

as bonuses or incentives which are hard to attain. In

this

way, peaceful minds at

work

have better

job

satisfaction which results in more productivity and skillfulness.

Therefore

, workers should be awarded a one-month holiday.

Conversely

, the problem with these breaks being awarded to

employees

is that it leads to sluggishness and laziness of the staff. To cope with

this

lethargy employers usually focus on on-the-

job

training and day-release programmes. These aid

employees

in achieving better career progression and better

job

prospects.

Moreover

, holidays

also

impact the growth of a company as a whole, because companies would not be able to achieve their coveted targets and goals.

For example

, if the deadline is near and the staff is on holiday, it becomes impossible for the company to accomplish a project or a task.

Hence

, people should not be getting time off from

work

. In conclusion, a little time off from the

job

is indispensable for a healthy

work

/life balance, but these breaks negatively impact the productivity and competency of the

employees

.