Town and cities are attractive places. Some people suggest that the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are people asserting that authorities should allocate budget to artistic schemes which make the cities more attractive to city dwellers.

However

, I completely disagree with

this

notion

due to

compelling reasons which will be elaborated in

this

essay.

To begin

with, there are other plans which are more beneficial for citizens than erecting statues in the streets.

In other words

, the budget of governments is limited, so they ought to choose between numerous plans

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and approve schemes that can bring more prosperity to people.

For instance

, many cities have poor public transportation systems;

hence

the mayors should alter buses and subways

instead

of paying for artwork. Another argument against

this

idea is that taste in art varies between people.

That is

, a piece of art may seem very charming to a person

while

it would be a meaningless object to another person.

As a result

, it would be an impossible mission for authorities in charge of choosing artworks for the cities to find a work that everybody likes

it

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

. The alternative is for everybody to pay for the genre that appeals to them, and not allocate the government to these plans. In conclusion,

although

many folk believe that it is the government's obligation to spend public funds on artistic works which can be presented in the city streets, I disagree with

this

idea because

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

artistic taste is not similar in society, and the public budget is restricted.