Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some poeple think that interviews is not a reliable mthod of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is argued that the best method to recruit employees for the job is arranging interviewing sessions which are usually preferred by most large-scale companies,
whereas
the rest of the people have a strong faith in other ways of selecting workers.
Although
the interview is an appropriate mode which allows one to check the individual's qualification level
as well as
background, I believe that the other criteria are
also
significant for checking how much practical knowledge and skill is acquired by the recruiter.
To begin
with, the first point viewpoint which is taking interviews can assist hiring managers to know the basic details about the person.
This
is because in the interviews manager has an opportunity to ask any questions regarding past experiences, certain backgrounds, qualifications and difficult questions relating to the
certain
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
field in which the employee wants to work
in
Change preposition
apply
show examples
.
For instance
, the biggest Tata Steel company in the U.S. revealed that they are choosing the best employers from 10 out of 1 who do not
lacks
Correct subject-verb agreement
lack
show examples
in any single question from the total questionnaire session.
However
,
according to
, my perspective interviews are not enough the other factors and capabilities required to run the business cannot be ignored.
Apart from
this
, education is necessary but other practical knowledge is a must which can be checked by arranging demo sessions where the performance of the representative should be analysed.
This
is because the most essential abilities needed in an operator are leadership, coordination for teamwork, communication skills and
independency
Replace the word
independence
show examples
which make a person an adequate employee and can be only experienced by the manager when analysing their trial during demo recruitment sessions.
For example
, as per the news headlines in Argentina, the labourer's work is customised first before selecting the final workers.
That is
why if the person will already check it gives relief to the manager and no regret in future.
To conclude
,
it is clear that
an interview is just like a discussion which does not disclose the inner abilities of human beings as I firmly opine that other ways are helpful for choosing skilled employees for the splendid earnings and growth of organisations.
Submitted by anureet370 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
The essay demonstrates a reasonable level of coherence with a moderate logical structure. However, there is a need for improvement in presenting a clear introduction and conclusion. The main points are adequately supported, but there is room for enhancing the overall coherence and cohesion of the essay.
task achievement
The essay partially addresses the task and provides relevant ideas, but there is a lack of depth and comprehensive development. It is important to focus on providing a more complete response to the task question and further developing the ideas presented. Additionally, more specific examples and evidence could be incorporated to strengthen the response.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • interpersonal skills
  • communication abilities
  • bias
  • assessment centers
  • psychometric testing
  • peer assessments
  • first impressions
  • discrimination
  • competence
  • reliable
  • selection criteria
  • holistic
What to do next:
Look at other essays: