The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
#proportion #categories #families #poverty #australia #summarise #information #features #comparisons
The table illustrates the percentage of six different types of households that are living in poverty in Australia in the year 1999.
From the statistics, it can be inferred that sole-parent and aged couples take up the highest and lowest proportion of shortage, respectively.
In addition
, it is noticeable that households with children are more likely to suffer from insufficient money in comparison to elderly people.
Apparently, Linking Words
while
Single parents constitute more than one-fifth of poor level, single-aged persons made up 6%, at 54000. Linking Words
Also
, couples with children are more likely to suffer from a shortage. Linking Words
In contrast
, couples without children contain a lower proportion, at 7%.
Aged couple people were at least more likely to face adequate money and just 4% of them are poor. Linking Words
In addition
, single individuals needed more money Linking Words
due to
359000 of them didn’t have sufficient fees. It is Linking Words
also
worth noting that the Linking Words
overall
population of Australian individuals in poverty was 1837000 which represented 11%.Linking Words
Submitted by Poseidous on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "also, in addition".
▼
Vocabulary: Only 6 basic words for charts were used.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "proportion" was used 2 times.
▼