The most effective way to solve traffic and pollution problems is to encourage people to move from the suburbs into the city. To what extent do you agree and disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is an almost universal consensus that
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
individual
Fix the agreement mistake
individuals
show examples
should relocate to a metropolis in order to reduce traffic jams and pollution issues. I completely disagree with
this
assertion and will give my reasons below. It is understandable why they think people should relocate to the city for careers.
Firstly
, when people migrate to larger cities, they will stay
nearby
Correct your spelling
near
show examples
their worksites.
As a result
, they no longer have to commute to city and rural areas on a daily basis, after which, the number of vehicles
such
as trucks, cars, and motorcycles will be declined.
This
means that it would
be
Unnecessary verb
apply
show examples
limited
Replace the word
limit
show examples
traffic congestion and poisonous
emission
Fix the agreement mistake
emissions
show examples
, which is emitted into the atmosphere.
However
,
this
plan is impossible to implement because it is impractical in many ways. On top of that, the best way to diminish transportation problems is
that
Correct word choice
for
show examples
the local council should
promote
Verb problem
encourage
show examples
businesses to build their production units in smaller countries and recruit workers there.
Consequently
, citizens who live in the suburbs are not required to work far from home.
For example
, the government in India motivates companies in their country to build industry units in the outskirts, leading to the satisfaction of individuals,
hence
, they work more efficiently and always go to work on time, because they no longer spend time on the road from the countryside to the city.
Furthermore
, the majority of inhabitants have a tendency to make more money in their local than in any other region.
This
is simply because they do not allocate their budget to transportation like repair and gasoline costs. In conclusion, it is supposed that the migration of individuals to larger cities helps to reduce the traffic jams and the bad effects on the atmosphere. In my perspective, it is too hard to implement and the government should launch a different scheme to improve
this
problem.
Submitted by huynhthimylinh3001 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the task, but the response lacks in-depth analysis and fails to fully address the question.
coherence and cohesion
While the essay has some logical organization, there are areas where the logical structure is unclear, and the essay does not fully develop a clear introduction and conclusion.
lexical resource
The essay uses a mixture of simple and complex vocabulary, but there is room for improvement in demonstrating a wider range of vocabulary and more precise word choices.
grammatical range
The essay exhibits control of a range of grammatical structures, but there are instances of errors and lack of variety in sentence structures.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: