Looking at the graph given we are able to decipher that it shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. This is further divided into males and females which can be seen by looking at the key.

Looking at the

graph

given we are able to decipher that it shows the

number

of university

graduates

in Canada from 1992 to 2007.

This

is

further

divided into

males

and

females

which can be seen by looking at the key. Glancing at the

graph

it is clearly visible that the

number

of

graduates

for both

males

and

females

have

Change the verb form

has

show examples

grown to reach their

peaks

Fix the agreement mistake

peak

show examples

in 2007. In the year 1992, when the

graph

began recording the data the

number

of female

graduates

was 100,000

whereas

the

males

were at 70,000.

This

shows that there were always more female

graduates

in Canada by 30,000.

However

, as the years continued

this

gap became even more evident as in 2007, the difference between the two was around 34,000. Taking a better look at the

graph

, we can see that there were a lot of fluctuations in the numbers especially for the

females

. In the year 1994, the

number

stopped growing but

instead

, dipped back down to around 100,000 again.

This

went on till 2001

where

Rephrase

when

show examples

then

it began to grow again at a much steeper rate. During the years leading up to

2002

Add a comma

,2002

show examples

there were 20,000 more

graduates

which was the fastest growth recorded between both

females

and

males

.

Then

,

this

slowed down in 2004

where

Correct word choice

when

show examples

the

number

stagnated at just below 130,000.

After

this

, like before, the

amount

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of female

graduates

started to rapidly increase again reaching

the

Correct article usage

a

show examples

peak in 2007 as mentioned before. Moving on to the male

graduates

it is visible that there are

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

fluctuations and it is more steady. There is an almost identical rise and dip as described for the

females

from 1994 to 1999.

Then

, between

then

and 2000 there was a small rise by around 15,000

however

,

that is

shortlived as in 2001 it

plummited

Correct your spelling

plummeted

again.

After

this

came the biggest rise there was for male

graduates

yet. Like the female

graduates

it lasted from 2002 till 2004 after which it started to slow down

unlike

Add the comma(s)

,unlike

show examples

the

females

who continued to increase.