Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. So, companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the development of gender equality sentiments, an increasing number of

employees

are

women

recently.

However

, an unfair social fact is that most advanced-level

positions

still prefer males, still has been common. Ergo, some individuals have proposed that

companies

are responsible for following a new rule, which allocates a certain percentage of high-level

positions

are

women

. In

this

essay, I will explore both sides of

this

proposal by highlighting positive and negative aspects, arguing for a balanced view.  One compelling merit of

this

new rule is that it will be welcomed by most basic-level

employees

.

This

is because

women

can show higher

empathy

ability compared with men, and higher

empathy

leaders have more opportunities to allow

employees

to feel satisfied.

Moreover

, a high satisfaction level represents a low turnover rate. Definitely, it is beneficial for the long-term development of

companies

.

For instance

, if a seller who is employed by a pet supply company, and shows excellent sales performance, complains of relationship problems with her/his co-workers, a female manager may have a higher success rate in handling the person's problem since she has a natural ability about high

empathy

. In short, higher

empathy

of

women

may become a vital reason that can be used to support

this

proposal.

Conversely

,

women

also

have an obvious demerit that may lead to a potential risk for a company's management

positions

. Chiefly. higher

empathy

may have some negative influence on wisdom decisions.

For example

, there is a Chinese idiom, which abandons oneself to emotion.

Furthermore

,

this

proverb is characterized by someone allowing themselves to be controlled completely by a feeling, and it means a lack of rational identity. Obviously, it is dangerous for them to make a decision;

hence

, higher

empathy

may be a good reason to help a company persuade the administration to hire more females to do high-level

positions

,

while

it may have become an obstacle factor for the success of

this

proposal. The gist of the matter is that females playing more high-level

positions

is a double-edged sword. on the one hand,

this

group makes it easier to deal with conflict issues of basic-level

employees

and avoid more dismission happening.

On the other hand

, they

also

may make more risky decisions that bring more negative effects on

companies

' profits

due to

a higher

empathy

for natural character traits. So I believe that

companies

need to provide more chances

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

women

to take part in high-level

positions

and cultivate a partnership between men and

women

in leadership

positions

.