Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, there has been controversy about whether leaders and directors tend to be more senior or youngsters could take these positions. From my perspective,

while

I agree that some directors should be young people to add more creativity, I think that the older generation has more experience to avoid typical mistakes that might be caused in the

company

. On the one hand, the youth are more enthusiastic and have a lot of ideas to develop production and increase the margin.

In other words

, young individuals can think outside the box and make quite efforts to reach the

company

's goals. In Russia,

for example

, one cooperative decided to attract young employees to solve different challenges, they managed to improve the productivity of the organization and even invested in new ways to improve efficiency.

Thus

,

this

makes it clear that new young brains can solve many internal issues in ways that work in today's world and its up to date.

On the other hand

, the elder generation is more experienced in their field and valuable employees.

Furthermore

, they have been expending the significant time of their lifespan to gain experience and skills

hence

, become expert in their job environments.

For instance

, older people can decide immediately when a

company

faces issues

due to

their personal knowledge.

Therefore

, these old leaders not only manage the emergency situation but

also

can teach the young workforce to become more and more knowledgeable. In conclusion,

i

Change the capitalization

I

show examples

believe it is a good opportunity to give youth a critical position in the

company

. Meanwhile in that case it would be better that one leader

o

Correct your spelling

or

director teach them to enhance their expertise and skills.