It is believed that there are disparities in the types of jobs compatible for males or females owing to their distinct physical and mental strengths. Although occupational suitability based on gender is justifiable to some degree, reality, in my opinion, has proven otherwise.

It is believed that there are disparities in the types of

jobs

compatible for males or females owing to their distinct physical and mental strengths.

Although

occupational suitability based on gender is justifiable to some degree, reality, in my opinion, has proven

otherwise

. On the one hand, it would be absurd to ignore the fact that

jobs

that require tremendous physical strength and agility

such

as mining feature male

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

.

Women

, meanwhile, are assumed to be better at tasks that take great patience

as well as

skills to perform like household chores. In fact, a majority of men and

women

could not exchange their preferred fields of expertise, which is a strong reason for the distribution of the types of

jobs

among the two sexes.

On the other hand

, I still believe there should not be any specific rules for occupational compatibility regarding gender. A lot of men are growing more interested in taking responsibility for childcare and housework which are typically considered feminine.

Women

,

by contrast

, are showing great versatility in various

jobs

, even those demanding both brains and brawn. Female gymnasts have been increasing in number, and nobody can deny that mental and physical perseverance are fundamental for gymnastics.

In addition

,

women

’s social status has been improved thanks to the success of world-class businesswomen and politicians, Hillary Clinton

for example

.

This

is plain proof of the belief in gender-specific career pursuits. In conclusion,

while

there is still some truth to the aforementioned disparity in job selection, I think men and

women

are now equal in terms of

such

an aspect.