In
this
day and age, there are plenty of people who consume
tobacco
, and they could have the benefit of some approval to smoke in some public places
such
as restaurants and offices.
AlthoughCorrect word choice
show examples
, some nations are putting effort into not allowing
this
legislation to happen.
This
essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the idea of smoking in public simply
wantsCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
to have
freedomAdd an article
show examples
to do what they want.
ConsumerFix the agreement mistake
show examples
could insist that
tobacco
is their enjoyable habit, and every human being should have their own human
rightsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to do what
it Correct pronoun usage
show examples
gives them pleasure
especiallyAdd the comma(s)
show examples
in workplaces, which makes them
to Change the verb form
show examples
have better output. For these
tobacco
is the case.
For example
, the severe kingdom in Iran had given
the Correct article usage
show examples
permission to their nation to have freedom of smoking.
Furthermore
, proponents could cite that
tobacco
gives them the opportunity to concentrate better.
This
kind of drug
developChange the verb form
show examples
such
calmness and relaxation that
takerCorrect article usage
show examples
could be in an adequate
to think and work better in offices, which makes them
to Change the verb form
show examples
have a better output.
Overall
,
this
lawmaking amends the process of work for those who smoke. As an example, workers who can have their little competent thing
,Remove the comma
show examples
could regularly present in a satisfactory way.
However
,
opponentFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of smoking
tobacco
in specific
placeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
could claim that
this
action could endanger other’s state of health. When consumers of
tobacco
smoke in closed
roomFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of eating
placeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
or working places, it seems that other attendees suffer from the smoky air, which
it Correct pronoun usage
show examples
can later cause lounge cancer.
For example
, 20% of
damageCorrect article usage
show examples
is belongChange the verb form
show examples
to
the Correct article usage
show examples
smokers and the other 80% to
the Correct article usage
show examples
people who
breathReplace the word
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
poisoned air.
Moreover
, critics of
this
idea could cite that
this
unpleasant routine could show the city less aesthetic.
BeautyAdd an article
show examples
of
townCorrect article usage
show examples
should be saved
due to
the policy of tourists. When a state
does not have the attraction noRewrite the sentence
does not have the attraction any
has the attraction no
show examples
longer, it can damage
country’sCorrect article usage
show examples
rollCorrect your spelling
show examples
toChange preposition
show examples
the world. In
this
opponents could say that smokers should be obliged to not do
this
troubled manner. Some Asian countries do not have a pretty look
inChange preposition
show examples
other’s nationality
mindFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
In conclusion, I would side with the opponents of smoking
tobacco
in public places
asCorrect quantifier usage
show examples
restaurants and offices. It seems reasonable that
stateCorrect article usage
show examples
of health and beauty of
cityAdd an article
show examples
are more essential than enjoying and
haveWrong verb form
show examples
a dangerous
freewillCorrect your spelling
show examples
of smoking.