Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is generally agreed that the higher

is

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

the level of

employee’s

Correct article usage

an employee’s

show examples

responsibility, the higher his salary should be.

However

, some disagree with

this

statement, emphasising that ordinary workers often contribute to the company’s success even more than white collars, so there should be no gap between incomes.

This

essay will explore both perspectives,

although

I personally support the former. The idea of paying more to directors is based on the fact that managers are typically more skilled, professional and well-rounded than their subordinates,

consequently

, their level of prosperity is deserved. To cite an example, if a person wants to to climb up the ladder, he usually needs to graduate from a prestigious university,

than

Replace the word

then

show examples

work

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

low-level positions to gain some experience,

than

Replace the word

then

show examples

take more responsibilities and commence his duties with full commitment. Building

such

a career requires a lot of time and enormous

efforts

Fix the agreement mistake

effort

show examples

,

hence

, I believe it is fair to pay more to those who managed to go through

this

way.

Additionally

, being more experienced than low-skilled workers, directors are barely replaceable, so it is in the company’s interest to offer them a good salary and valuable perks in order to encourage them to stay. The opponents of

this

approach may argue that staff members

also

deserve to be well-paid

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

since many of them work round-the-clock in order to achieve corporate goals.

Furthermore

, it is an ordinary worker who produces goods or services that bring the company profit.

For instance

, if there were no salesmen or

delivery men

Correct your spelling

deliverymen

show examples

,

such

affluent corporations as Amazon or Walmart would not exist.

Accordingly

, it may be said that regular employees have a right to receive equal compensation to their leaders.

However

, I firmly believe that

salary

Correct article usage

a salary

show examples

based on experience and the level of

responsibilities

Fix the agreement mistake

responsibility

show examples

is more reasonable than just the same payment to everyone. Without financial incentives, workers may lack motivation to grow, potentially stalling the company's progress.

Also

, receiving

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

fair compensation for their knowledge and input, executives are dedicated to

make

Change the verb form

making

show examples

the company prosperous, which in the long run provides conditions to increase the wage for all staff members.

To conclude

,

while

some assume that chiefs should not get higher income than non-executive

employee

Fix the agreement mistake

employees

show examples

, I disagree with

this

view. In my opinion, since substantial income comes with skills, dedication and responsibility, managers’ high salaries are well-deserved.