Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree?

In many developed countries, more than half the workforce are
women
,
however
, it is noticeable that the higher
positions
in many of the big companies consist of more
men
. People argue that a certain proportion of jobs should be reserved for ladies, but I disagree with the suggestion because
men
and
women
should compete on the same ground, and more female workers available
do
Correct subject-verb agreement
does
show examples
not mean that all of them want to be on top. Competition for higher
positions
in large companies should be fair.
This
applies to both
men
and
women
, as to become a leader, one must possess the qualifications, the right attitude, commitment, and capability to lead their workers. What is important for
women
is to have the same opportunities as
men
, not to be given special quotas.
For example
, if there are 5 candidates who come in for an interview to fill 2 manager
positions
, and there is a lady among the other 4
men
, if the lady has the lowest mark among all, it is not fair to be hired just because one position is allocated for female.
In addition
, even if more
women
contribute to the working population, it does not mean that they have a greater number of females qualified to apply for the job, or they have the desire to fight for the role. Not many
women
pursue high-level
positions
because they prefer to work within comfortable hours and have less responsibility at work, as they want to have more time for their families. As we can see, there are more female graduates from university each year compared to
men
, but many wives opted to be less successful than their husbands to spend more time tending to their families. In conclusion,
while
some people suggest special allocation for
women
in larger corporations, I believe that the hiring requirement should be fair based on capabilities, and the majority of
women
prefer to be less successful in return for time with their families.
Submitted by shaz.777 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Example Variety
Consider introducing a wider range of specific examples to support your arguments, especially when discussing why not all women may aspire to high-level positions.
Clear Stance
Clarify your stance earlier in the essay to guide the reader through your argument more effectively.
Tone
Pay attention to maintaining a formal tone throughout the essay, avoiding generalizations or assumptions about preferences based on gender.
Structure
The essay presents a logical structure, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which makes your argument easy to follow.
Argument Depth
Your essay articulates a clear argument against the quota system for women in high positions, focusing on meritocracy and individual choice, which shows depth in understanding the prompt.
Use of Examples
You've effectively used a hypothetical example to illustrate the unfairness of a quota system, which helps clarify your standpoint.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Gender diversity
  • Affirmative action
  • Meritocracy
  • Quotas
  • Glass ceiling
  • Legal enforcement
  • Tokenism
  • Voluntary measures
  • Career progression
  • Representation
  • Workforce parity
  • Backlash
  • Historical imbalances
  • Corporate governance
  • Inclusive practices
  • Boardroom dynamics
  • Gender norms
  • Unconscious bias
  • Regulatory frameworks
  • Corporate ladder
What to do next:
Look at other essays: