in recent years, many countries banned
smokers
from smoking in public Use synonyms
places
. Smoking in restaurants, parks and in front the Use synonyms
children
without their care has a great impact on prevalence of the lung disease and cancer. from my perspective, I fully agree with banning smoking in public Use synonyms
places
.
Use synonyms
Firstly
, smoking has serious consequences for Linking Words
smokers
themselves, their family and their friends. Passive means inhalation of tobacco smoking which is one of the most dangerous exposures to non-Use synonyms
smokers
. Use synonyms
For instance
, Ireland was one of those countries which prevent using of smoking in public Linking Words
places
, they record declining in the prevalence of related diseases.
Use synonyms
Secondly
, these restrictions assist Linking Words
smokers
and addicted people to drop out of smoking Use synonyms
whereas
the prohibition in public areas could help Linking Words
smokers
to stay a long time without smoke because there are penalties and fines. Use synonyms
However
, the insertion of these limitations decreases the exposure of Linking Words
children
and ill people who have asthma to the polluted air. Use synonyms
furthermore
, maintaining of healthy environment, and improving residents’ awareness of the seriousness of Linking Words
this
sequel should come from government laws. Linking Words
For example
, some Linking Words
children
who have breathing problems have a history of exposure.
In conclusion, I advocate banning smoking in public Use synonyms
places
because it can improve the community's health and instill the idea in Use synonyms
children
about the effects and disadvantageous of smoking. Statute rules in the country can provide enhanced community awareness.Use synonyms
rraghad.b