The ownership of car should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Car ownership limitation for every family is one of the suggested ways to reduce traffic and
air
pollution. I completely agree with this
method, and I heartfully believe that in this
way people
could help to have a
better Remove the article
apply
air
quality
and better life style
, which each one will discuss below.
To commence with, modern society demands modern facilities Correct your spelling
lifestyle
for
per person like personal Change preposition
apply
vehicle
, which has Fix the agreement mistake
vehicles
its
negative consequences. Specially, cars have Correct pronoun usage
apply
the
prominent role in Correct article usage
a
air
contamination. By banning the
vehicle ownership, the improvement Correct article usage
apply
of
Change preposition
in
air
quality
will be obvious, which in turn, helps
Wrong verb form
will help
people
to enjoy a
better weather. Remove the article
apply
For instance
, this
rule has executed
in Tabriz, which now Add a missing verb
been executed
this
city has a
better Correct article usage
apply
air
quality
in contrast
with other cities in Iran.
On the other hand
, less usage of private cars could lead to better physical and mental health. Particularly, if people
try to avoid utilizing public or private transportation, they will increase their activity which could lead to have more healthier body. Also
, being active has a great impact on improving mental status specifically anxiety and depression. For example
, based on researches
, Fix the agreement mistake
research
people
who are more active, have less probability to be
prone to heart disease and depression.
In a nutshell, banning rules for car ownership Change preposition
of being
for improving
Change preposition
to improve
air
quality
and less traffic has been suggested. This
method could be beneficial in two ways. First,
cars are the main resource
of Correct your spelling
source
air
contamination, and decreasing their appliance could be useful. The second point is related to individuals’ mental and physical health, which less usage of vehicles could improve them.Submitted by aksoysana on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Try to include more relevant examples to support your main points. This will strengthen your arguments and make your essay more convincing.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the logical structure by ensuring each paragraph flows smoothly into the next. Transitional phrases and linking words could be used more effectively.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are clear and well-defined, effectively framing the essay.
task achievement
You have addressed the task well by discussing both the environmental benefits and health benefits of restricting car ownership.